Shark Tank US Sharks Debate Over MinusCal Product: Key Questions Answered

The pitch for MinusCal in Season 11 of Shark Tank remains one of the most intense medical/supplement debates in the show's history. It featured a fierce clash between the entrepreneurs' sales success and the Sharks' (specifically Mark Cuban’s) ethical concerns regarding weight-loss claims.   Here is a breakdown of the key questions answered and the debate that unfolded.

The Product: What is MinusCal? MinusCal is a line of snack bars and supplements designed to aid weight loss. Its "hero" ingredient is Ferulin, a natural extract from green tea leaves. The entrepreneurs, Barrett Jacques and Crom Carmichael, claimed that Ferulin blocks the enzyme responsible for fat absorption.

Key Questions Answered During the Pitch: How does it work? The entrepreneurs claimed it blocks about 12% of fat absorption in the small intestine.Are there side effects? Unlike older fat-blocking drugs (like Alli), they claimed MinusCal does not cause "digestive urgency" or accidents because it blocks a smaller, more manageable percentage of fat. the pitch. They had done $1.3 million in sales in the previous 12 months, proving significant consumer demand.

What sparked the heated argument among the Sharks over MinusCal? The Sharks clashed over the validity and market potential of MinusCal, a product claiming to 'block calories.' Skepticism from some Sharks (like Mr. Wonderful) about the science behind the product led to a fiery debate, with Mark Cuban and others either defending or challenging its viability.

How does the MinusCal controversy compare to other Shark Tank fights, like Breathometer? Like Breathometer (a failed product Cuban later sued), MinusCal faced scrutiny over its claims. However, the MinusCal argument was more about scientific credibility, while Breathometer's conflict revolved around misleading technology and legal repercussions.

Create Answer