Related Questions
A total of 5 cryptocurrency questions
Share Your Thoughts with BYDFi
Trending
Uniswap Launches on OKX X Layer as Exchange Expands DeFi Push
Uniswap Goes Live on OKX’s X Layer, Accelerating the Shift Toward Exchange-Led DeFi
Uniswap’s expansion to OKX’s X Layer represents more than a routine blockchain deployment. It signals a strategic acceleration in how major crypto exchanges are reshaping their role within decentralized finance. By bringing Uniswap’s liquidity and trading infrastructure directly onto its proprietary layer-2 network, OKX is positioning itself at the center of a rapidly evolving DeFi landscape where scalability, accessibility, and integration matter more than ever.
The launch enables users on X Layer to access Uniswap’s markets with lower transaction costs and faster execution, leveraging layer-2 efficiencies while remaining fully compatible with Ethereum’s ecosystem. For traders and liquidity providers alike, this integration removes many of the traditional barriers associated with mainnet congestion and high gas fees, making decentralized trading more practical for everyday use.
X Layer’s Role in OKX’s Long-Term DeFi Vision
X Layer, introduced in 2024, serves as the foundational infrastructure behind OKX’s decentralized ambitions. Built as an Ethereum Virtual Machine–compatible network, it allows developers to deploy familiar smart contracts while benefiting from reduced costs and improved scalability. More importantly, X Layer is deeply integrated with OKX’s centralized exchange and wallet services, creating a unified environment where users can move seamlessly between centralized and decentralized finance.
This level of integration reflects a deliberate strategy. Rather than treating DeFi as a separate ecosystem, OKX is embedding it directly into its broader product offering. Assets can flow from exchange accounts to onchain applications with minimal friction, helping onboard users who may be new to decentralized finance but already trust established platforms.
Why Uniswap’s Integration Matters
Uniswap’s presence on X Layer immediately strengthens the network’s credibility. As one of the most widely used decentralized exchanges in the world, Uniswap consistently ranks among the top DeFi protocols by total value locked and trading volume. Its liquidity pools support thousands of token pairs, making it a critical component of the broader crypto market infrastructure.
According to Uniswap Labs, swaps on X Layer are executed without additional protocol fees, allowing users to benefit directly from lower layer-2 costs. Uniswap founder Hayden Adams has emphasized that expanding to new networks like X Layer is essential for driving long-term growth, increasing liquidity, and reaching users where they already operate.
For OKX, Uniswap is not just another application; it is a cornerstone of the exchange’s second-phase rollout, which focuses on integrating major DeFi protocols and reinforcing core infrastructure. This phase is part of a larger, multi-stage roadmap aimed at transforming OKX into a hybrid platform that bridges centralized liquidity with decentralized innovation.
Exchanges Embrace Layer-2 Networks to Capture Onchain Activity
OKX is not alone in this approach. Across the industry, major exchanges are increasingly launching or supporting layer-2 blockchains as a way to connect centralized user bases with onchain activity. Coinbase’s launch of Base demonstrated how quickly exchange-backed networks can gain traction when paired with strong developer tools and popular DeFi protocols.
Base rapidly emerged as a dominant environment for decentralized exchange trading, with Uniswap accounting for a significant share of its activity. This success has reinforced the idea that exchanges can play a pivotal role in scaling DeFi adoption by offering familiar interfaces, trusted infrastructure, and seamless access to decentralized applications.
Other platforms have followed similar paths, using layer-2 technology to reduce costs, improve performance, and retain users within their ecosystems. These developments suggest that the future of crypto trading will increasingly blur the line between centralized and decentralized models.
BYDFi and the Expanding DeFi Access Landscape
As exchange-led DeFi strategies continue to mature, platforms like BYDFi are also becoming increasingly relevant. BYDFi has built its reputation by offering flexible trading tools that cater to both beginners and experienced traders, while maintaining a strong focus on accessibility and global reach.
As more users seek exposure to decentralized finance without sacrificing usability or security, exchanges that support both traditional trading and DeFi access stand to gain a competitive edge. BYDFi’s growing presence in the crypto market highlights how platforms can complement the broader DeFi ecosystem by providing gateways to onchain opportunities, whether through direct integrations or simplified access to decentralized markets.
What This Means for the Future of DeFi
The launch of Uniswap on OKX’s X Layer underscores a broader shift in how decentralized finance is being built and distributed. Rather than existing solely on independent blockchains, DeFi protocols are increasingly being embedded within exchange-backed networks that offer scalability, liquidity, and user-friendly access.
This model has the potential to accelerate adoption by lowering technical barriers and aligning incentives between exchanges, developers, and users. At the same time, it intensifies competition among layer-2 networks, where success will depend on liquidity depth, application diversity, and real-world usability.
With Uniswap now live on X Layer and further integrations expected, OKX has taken a decisive step toward shaping the next phase of decentralized finance. As platforms like OKX, Coinbase, and BYDFi continue to evolve, the crypto industry appears to be moving toward a more interconnected future—one where centralized exchanges and decentralized protocols work together to define how digital finance operates at scale.
2026-01-21 · 3 days agoCrypto Market Structure Rulemaking May Take Years, Says Paradigm Executive
Crypto Market Structure Rules Could Take Years to Materialize, Paradigm Executive Warns
The long-awaited push to regulate the crypto industry in the United States may be closer to becoming law, but its real-world impact could still be years away. According to a senior executive at crypto investment firm Paradigm, even if Congress passes the current market structure bill, the path from legislation to full implementation will be slow, complex, and drawn out.
Justin Slaughter, Paradigm’s vice president of regulatory affairs, says the industry should not expect immediate clarity once the bill is signed. Instead, the rulemaking phase that follows could stretch across multiple presidential administrations, delaying meaningful regulatory certainty well into the future.
From Legislation to Reality: Why Rulemaking Takes So Long
Passing a bill is only the first step in shaping how markets operate. Once lawmakers approve legislation, the responsibility shifts to regulatory agencies, which must translate broad legal language into detailed, enforceable rules. This process, known as rulemaking, often involves drafting proposed regulations, publishing them for public review, collecting feedback from stakeholders, and issuing final versions with legal force.
Slaughter emphasized that the current crypto market structure proposal is unusually complex. He noted that the bill requires dozens of separate rulemakings across multiple agencies, each with its own timelines, priorities, and political pressures. In total, the legislation mandates approximately 45 individual rulemaking processes, a scale that virtually guarantees years of regulatory work.
Even a Signed Bill Won’t Mean Immediate Clarity
The market structure bill has already advanced through important stages in Congress, including movement toward Senate committee markups. Bipartisan negotiations are ongoing, and the legislation is gradually gaining momentum. However, Slaughter cautions that even an ideal scenario—where both chambers of Congress pass the bill and the president signs it—would not lead to fast results.
In his view, the full implementation of the rules could take nearly two presidential terms to complete. That means exchanges, developers, and investors may continue operating in a partially defined regulatory environment for much longer than many in the industry expect.
Lessons From History: The Dodd-Frank Comparison
To illustrate his point, Slaughter pointed to a familiar precedent in U.S. financial regulation. The Dodd-Frank Act, passed in 2010 following the global financial crisis, aimed to overhaul the financial system and reduce systemic risk. While the law itself was enacted swiftly, many of its key rules took years to finalize.
Some Dodd-Frank provisions were not fully implemented until three to eight years after the law passed, and certain elements are still debated today. Slaughter argues that crypto regulation could follow a similar trajectory, especially given the novelty of digital assets and the overlapping jurisdictions of U.S. regulators.
The Bill Still Faces Political Risk
Before any rulemaking can begin, the legislation must first survive the political process. Slaughter acknowledged that even strong bills often stall, collapse, or get rewritten multiple times before finally becoming law. He noted that it is common for major legislation to die more than once during negotiations before eventually crossing the finish line.
Upcoming Senate hearings and markups will be critical moments for the bill’s future. Whether bipartisan cooperation holds or breaks down could determine how quickly—or slowly—the legislation progresses.
What This Means for the Crypto Industry
For an industry that has repeatedly called for clear and consistent regulation, the message is sobering. While progress is being made in Washington, regulatory certainty is unlikely to arrive overnight. Crypto companies may need to continue navigating ambiguity, compliance risks, and shifting enforcement priorities for several more years.
Still, Slaughter remains cautiously optimistic. Despite the long timelines and political uncertainty, he believes the process is moving in the right direction. For now, patience may be the most valuable asset the crypto industry can hold as it waits for the regulatory framework to fully take shape.
Ready to Take Control of Your Crypto Journey? Start Trading Safely on BYDFi
2026-01-19 · 5 days agoBanks’ Stablecoin Fears Are Unsubstantiated Myths, Says Professor
Banks’ Stablecoin Fears Are Built on Myths, Says Columbia Professor
As US lawmakers prepare to move forward with long-awaited crypto market structure legislation, a fierce battle is unfolding behind the scenes — and stablecoins have become the unexpected flashpoint. According to a Columbia Business School professor, the loudest objections coming from the banking sector are not based on evidence, but on fear of losing profits.
Omid Malekan, an adjunct professor at Columbia and a well-known crypto educator, argues that much of the resistance to stablecoin yield-sharing is rooted in misinformation deliberately pushed to protect the traditional banking model. In a recent post on X, Malekan expressed frustration that progress on crypto legislation is being slowed by what he described as unsubstantiated myths surrounding stablecoin economics.
The Real Fight: Who Controls Stablecoin Yield?
At the heart of the debate lies a simple but powerful question: who should benefit from the interest generated by stablecoin reserves?
Stablecoin issuers typically hold reserves in US Treasury bills and bank deposits, which generate yield. Banks and their lobbyists argue that allowing issuers or platforms to share this yield with users creates a dangerous loophole. Their fear is that consumers, attracted by passive returns of around 5%, could pull billions of dollars out of traditional savings accounts, triggering a so-called deposit flight.
Malekan rejects this argument outright, calling it a convenient narrative designed to shield banks from competition rather than protect the financial system.
Why Stablecoins Don’t Drain Bank Deposits
One of the most persistent claims from the banking industry is that stablecoin adoption will inevitably shrink bank deposits. Malekan says this assumption ignores how the stablecoin market actually works.
Much of the demand for stablecoins comes from outside the United States. When foreign users purchase dollar-backed stablecoins, issuers are required to place reserves into US-based assets, including Treasury bills and bank deposits. Rather than draining the system, this process can inject new capital into American banks and government debt markets.
From this perspective, stablecoins are not a threat to deposits but a mechanism that can expand financial activity across borders.
Competition Isn’t the Problem — Profits Are
Another key myth, according to Malekan, is that stablecoins will cripple bank lending. In reality, stablecoins do not prevent banks from issuing loans. What they do is challenge banks’ ability to pay near-zero interest while earning substantial returns elsewhere.
Today, the average US savings account yields just over half a percent. If banks fear losing customers to yield-bearing stablecoins, Malekan argues, the solution is straightforward: pay savers more. Stablecoins introduce competition, not collapse.
Banks Are No Longer the Main Credit Engine
The argument that stablecoins could choke off credit also ignores a structural shift in the US financial system. Banks now provide only about one-fifth of total credit in the economy. The majority comes from non-bank sources such as money market funds, private credit firms, and capital markets.
These sectors could actually benefit from stablecoin adoption through faster settlement, lower transaction costs, and potentially reduced Treasury yields. Rather than weakening the system, stablecoins may enhance its efficiency.
Community Banks Aren’t the Real Victims
Much of the lobbying effort frames community and regional banks as the most vulnerable players. Malekan calls this another misleading narrative.
According to him, large money-center banks have far more to lose if stablecoins disrupt the status quo. Community banks are often used as a shield in public messaging, while the real objective is protecting the outsized profits of the largest financial institutions.
He describes the situation as an uncomfortable alliance between big banks defending their margins and certain crypto startups pitching services to smaller banks under the guise of protection.
Savers Matter Too — Not Just Borrowers
Public policy discussions often focus heavily on borrowers, but Malekan insists that savers deserve equal attention. Preventing stablecoin issuers from sharing yield effectively forces consumers to subsidize bank profits by accepting minimal returns on their money.
A healthy economy depends on both savers and borrowers. Blocking innovation that benefits savers simply to preserve existing profit structures undermines that balance.
Congress Faces a Choice: Consumers or Corporations
Malekan concludes with a clear message to lawmakers. The stablecoin yield debate should not be about preserving legacy advantages but about encouraging innovation and serving consumers.
He warns that many of the claims circulating in Washington lack empirical support and urges Congress to remain focused on progress rather than pressure from powerful lobbies.
Growing Pushback Against Banking Influence
The debate has also drawn reactions from legal and political figures. Lawyer and Senate candidate John Deaton recently reminded voters that senators are facing intense pressure from banking interests to prevent platforms like Coinbase from offering stablecoin rewards.
Deaton’s message was blunt: banks and career politicians do not necessarily act in the public’s best interest. He pointed out that restrictions on stablecoin yields could stifle innovation and limit consumer choice.
Coinbase has reportedly gone as far as warning that it may withdraw support for the CLARITY Act if lawmakers impose restrictions on stablecoin rewards beyond basic disclosure requirements — a sign of how high the stakes have become.
A Defining Moment for Crypto Regulation
As the market structure bill heads toward markup, the stablecoin yield issue may determine whether the US embraces a more competitive, consumer-focused financial system or reinforces the dominance of traditional banks.
2026-01-19 · 5 days agoX Plans Smart Cashtags Rollout for Crypto and Stock Tracking
X Prepares to Launch Smart Cashtags for Crypto and Stocks
Elon Musk’s social media platform X is taking another major step toward becoming a full-scale financial hub, as it prepares to introduce a new feature called Smart Cashtags next month. The upcoming tool is designed to give users instant access to real-time price data for cryptocurrencies and stocks directly within the platform.
According to early details shared by X’s product leadership, Smart Cashtags will go far beyond simple price displays. The feature is expected to integrate live market movements with social discussion, allowing users to follow how digital assets and public companies are performing while simultaneously tracking conversations, sentiment, and breaking news related to each asset.
Real-Time Markets Meet Social Intelligence
Nikita Bier, Head of Product at X, revealed that Smart Cashtags will allow users to tap into detailed information tied to crypto tokens, including smart contract data. Every listed asset will also feature a dedicated mentions section, highlighting recent discussions, trending posts, and relevant updates about the companies or development teams behind the asset.
Bier emphasized that X has already established itself as one of the fastest sources of financial information online, noting that massive investment decisions are influenced daily by content shared on the platform. With Smart Cashtags, X aims to transform that influence into a more structured financial discovery experience, blending market data with real-time social insight.
The company is currently gathering feedback from select users ahead of a broader public rollout expected in February.
Hints of In-App Trading Raise Expectations
Concept images circulating online have fueled speculation that Smart Cashtags could eventually support direct trading. One preview screenshot shows prominent Buy and Sell buttons embedded within asset pages, suggesting that X may be exploring native trading functionality.
While no official confirmation has been provided on how trading would work—or when it might launch—the visuals alone signal an ambitious direction. If implemented, such a feature could position X as a serious competitor to traditional trading apps by combining market execution with instant access to news and sentiment.
A Second Attempt at Cashtags—This Time Smarter
This isn’t X’s first experiment with financial tracking tools. In late 2022, the platform briefly introduced a Cashtags feature that displayed price charts for major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, along with leading stocks and ETFs. Those charts, powered by TradingView, also included external links to Robinhood for trading.
That version was eventually removed, but Smart Cashtags appear to represent a far more advanced and integrated approach, potentially keeping users entirely within the X ecosystem.
Payments, Licenses, and the Bigger Vision
X’s financial ambitions don’t stop at market data. The company has already secured money transmitter licenses in at least 25 U.S. states, laying the regulatory groundwork for future payment services. While it remains unclear how soon X will enable crypto or fiat payments, these licenses suggest that broader financial functionality is firmly on the roadmap.
Since acquiring the platform in October 2022, Musk has repeatedly described his vision of transforming X into an Everything App, combining social media, payments, investing, and communication under one roof. Smart Cashtags appear to be a key piece of that long-term strategy.
Crypto Community Pushback and Algorithm Transparency
The announcement comes amid growing debate within the crypto community, with some users accusing X of suppressing legitimate crypto-related content while allowing spam to flourish. Bier dismissed these claims as unfounded in a now-deleted post, calling the criticism a misconception.
Adding to the transparency push, Musk recently stated that X plans to open-source its recommendation algorithm within the coming week, a move that could reshape trust and accountability across the platform.
As Smart Cashtags prepare for launch, all eyes are on whether X can successfully merge social engagement with real-time financial tools—and whether this update marks the beginning of a deeper transformation of the platform into a global financial gateway.
As social platforms like X move closer to real-time market data and in-app trading, choosing a reliable and professional trading platform is more important than ever. BYDFi gives traders access to crypto markets with advanced tools, deep liquidity, and a user-friendly interface designed for both beginners and professionals. If you’re looking to trade smarter and faster, BYDFi offers a powerful alternative beyond social-driven hype.
2026-01-13 · 10 days agoMSCI Preserves Index Status for Crypto Treasury Companies
MSCI’s Decision Marks a Turning Point for Crypto Treasury Companies
Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) has delivered a significant boost to crypto-linked equities by confirming that digital asset treasury companies will remain included in its global market indexes, at least for the time being. The announcement comes after weeks of speculation and intense investor debate, as market participants feared that a sudden exclusion could trigger massive capital outflows and damage confidence in publicly traded crypto-focused firms.
This decision was not made lightly. MSCI acknowledged growing feedback from institutional investors who argued that the crypto treasury model is still evolving and requires deeper analysis before any sweeping classification changes are enforced.
Strategy Shares React Strongly to the News
The market reaction was immediate and telling. Shares of Strategy, the company led by well-known Bitcoin advocate Michael Saylor and widely regarded as the world’s largest crypto treasury firm, jumped sharply in after-hours trading. Although the stock had dipped during regular trading hours, it reversed course and climbed around 5% once MSCI’s position became public.
The price movement highlighted just how sensitive crypto treasury companies are to index-related decisions. Inclusion in major benchmarks plays a crucial role in maintaining institutional demand, liquidity, and long-term investor confidence.
What MSCI Considers a Digital Asset Treasury Company
MSCI defines digital asset treasury companies, often referred to as DATCOs, as firms where digital assets account for 50% or more of total assets on the balance sheet. This definition places companies like Strategy squarely under the spotlight, as their business models are increasingly intertwined with long-term exposure to Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
Rather than enforcing immediate exclusions, MSCI announced that these companies will undergo a broader and more comprehensive review process aimed at distinguishing between operating businesses and entities whose primary activities resemble investment holdings.
Why MSCI Chose Caution Over Immediate Exclusion
In its official statement, MSCI explained that the broader consultation is intended to preserve consistency with the core objectives of its indexes. These benchmarks are designed to track the performance of operating companies, not entities that function primarily as investment vehicles.
However, MSCI also recognized that the rapid rise of crypto treasury strategies has blurred traditional boundaries. Many companies still generate revenue from software, technology, or other services while simultaneously holding large digital asset positions. This complexity makes a simple, one-size-fits-all exclusion approach increasingly difficult to justify.
Why Index Inclusion Matters for Crypto Stocks
Remaining inside MSCI indexes carries enormous implications. Inclusion ensures eligibility for passive index funds and ETFs, which collectively manage trillions of dollars in assets. These funds automatically allocate capital based on index composition, meaning that exclusion could have forced large-scale selling regardless of a company’s fundamentals.
Analysts estimate that removing major crypto treasury firms from indexes could have erased billions of dollars in passive capital inflows, putting sustained pressure on share prices and weakening institutional participation.
A Broader Signal to Institutional Investors
Beyond individual stocks, MSCI’s move sends a broader message to the market. It suggests that major financial infrastructure providers are not yet ready to push crypto-exposed companies to the sidelines. Instead, they are opting for a more measured approach that balances innovation with index integrity.
This stance may help stabilize sentiment around crypto-related equities, particularly after a volatile period in late 2025 when many crypto treasury stocks experienced sharp drawdowns amid concerns about sustainability and valuation.
The Rapid Growth of Corporate Crypto Treasuries
The rise of digital asset treasuries has been one of the most notable institutional trends of the past two years. More than 190 publicly traded companies now hold Bitcoin on their balance sheets, while dozens of others have diversified into Ether, Solana, and additional altcoins.
For many firms, crypto exposure is no longer a speculative side bet but a core strategic decision tied to long-term views on monetary policy, inflation, and digital finance.
What Comes Next for MSCI and Crypto Treasury Firms
While MSCI’s decision offers temporary relief, it is not the final word. The broader consultation process will likely shape how digital asset treasury companies are classified in future index reviews. Investors, asset managers, and companies themselves will be watching closely, as the outcome could redefine how crypto exposure fits into traditional equity markets.
For now, crypto treasury firms remain firmly in the game — and MSCI’s pause has given them valuable time to prove that their models deserve a lasting place in global indexes.
As institutional interest in crypto continues to grow, choosing a reliable trading platform is more important than ever. BYDFi offers advanced trading tools, deep liquidity, and a secure environment designed for both professional and long-term investors. Start exploring smarter crypto trading with BYDFi today.
2026-01-08 · 15 days ago
BYDFi Official Blog
Popular Tags
Popular Questions
How to Use Bappam TV to Watch Telugu, Tamil, and Hindi Movies?
How to Withdraw Money from Binance to a Bank Account in the UAE?
ISO 20022 Coins: What They Are, Which Cryptos Qualify, and Why It Matters for Global Finance
Bitcoin Dominance Chart: Your Guide to Crypto Market Trends in 2025
The Best DeFi Yield Farming Aggregators: A Trader's Guide