Related Questions
A total of 5 cryptocurrency questions
Share Your Thoughts with BYDFi
Trending
US Senate Agriculture Committee Delays Crypto Bill Markup to Month’s End
US Senate Delays Crypto Market Structure Bill as Bipartisan Talks Continue
The push to bring regulatory clarity to the US crypto market has hit another temporary pause. Lawmakers on the US Senate Agriculture Committee have decided to delay the markup of the highly anticipated crypto market structure bill, pushing the process to the final week of January as negotiations continue behind the scenes.
The decision reflects ongoing efforts to secure broader bipartisan backing for legislation that could fundamentally reshape how digital assets are regulated in the United States.
Why the Senate Agriculture Committee Hit Pause
Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman John Boozman confirmed that the committee needs additional time to finalize unresolved details and bring more lawmakers on board. While progress has been made, Boozman emphasized that moving forward without sufficient bipartisan support could weaken the bill’s long-term viability.
According to Boozman, discussions have been constructive, and lawmakers are actively working toward consensus. However, the complexity of crypto regulation, combined with political sensitivities, has made it clear that rushing the markup could be counterproductive.
The committee now plans to mark up the legislation during the last week of January, giving negotiators a narrow window to bridge remaining gaps.
What This Crypto Bill Is Trying to Achieve
At the center of the debate is the question of who regulates what in the crypto industry. The bill aims to clearly define the roles of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, two agencies that have long overlapped in their oversight of digital assets.
For years, crypto companies and investors have operated in a regulatory gray zone, often facing enforcement actions without clear guidance. This legislation is expected to establish firm boundaries, offering long-awaited certainty for exchanges, developers, and institutional investors alike.
Because the Senate Agriculture Committee oversees the CFTC, its involvement is critical to shaping how commodities-like digital assets are regulated going forward.
Senate vs House: Different Paths to Crypto Regulation
The Senate bill is not the same as the House’s CLARITY Act, which passed in July. Due to procedural rules, the Senate must advance its own version, even though both bills aim to address similar regulatory challenges.
Originally, the Agriculture Committee planned to align its markup with the Senate Banking Committee, which oversees the SEC. While the Banking Committee is still expected to proceed, the Agriculture Committee’s delay introduces uncertainty into the timeline for unified Senate action.
This divergence highlights the difficulty of coordinating crypto legislation across committees with different priorities and regulatory philosophies.
Stablecoin Yields and Ethics Rules Take Center Stage
One of the most contentious areas in ongoing negotiations involves stablecoins and ethics provisions. Lawmakers and lobbyists are pushing for changes that would ban all stablecoin yield payments, extending restrictions beyond issuers to include third-party platforms such as crypto exchanges.
This push follows the GENIUS Act, which already prohibited stablecoin issuers from offering yields. Traditional banking lobbyists argue that allowing exchanges to provide yields creates unfair competition and regulatory loopholes.
At the same time, several Democratic senators are pressing for stronger ethics rules. These proposals include conflict-of-interest provisions designed to prevent public officials from profiting from ties to crypto companies, with some language explicitly covering the president and senior government officials.
Industry Pushback and Developer Protections
Crypto advocacy groups and major industry players are actively lobbying to protect software developers and non-custodial platforms. Their concern is that overly broad definitions could classify developers as financial intermediaries, subjecting them to compliance requirements designed for banks and brokers.
The industry argues that such a move would stifle innovation, push development offshore, and undermine the decentralized nature of blockchain technology. Ensuring that open-source developers are excluded from intermediary classifications remains a key demand from the crypto sector.
Political Risks and the Midterm Election Factor
Despite the momentum surrounding crypto regulation, political reality looms large. Investment bank TD Cowen recently warned that upcoming US midterm elections could significantly reduce the support needed to pass the bill.
If control of Congress shifts or political priorities change, the legislation could be delayed for years. TD Cowen suggested that the bill is more likely to pass in 2027, with full implementation potentially not arriving until 2029.
This timeline underscores why the crypto industry is watching January’s markup so closely. For many stakeholders, it may represent one of the last realistic windows for meaningful reform in the near term.
What Comes Next for US Crypto Regulation
While the delay may disappoint market participants eager for clarity, it also signals that lawmakers are taking the process seriously. A bill passed with strong bipartisan support is far more likely to survive political shifts and legal challenges.
As the final week of January approaches, attention will remain firmly fixed on Capitol Hill. Whether lawmakers can reconcile competing interests and deliver a comprehensive framework may determine the future of crypto innovation in the United States.
Ready to Take Control of Your Crypto Journey? Start Trading Safely on BYDFi
2026-01-19 · 5 days agoPOLAND ERUPTS: President’s Shock Veto Sparks a National War Over Crypto Freedom
BREAKING: Polish President Vetoes Landmark Crypto Bill in Stunning Move, Sparking Freedom vs. Chaos Political Showdown
Warsaw, Poland – In a dramatic political maneuver that has thrown the nation's financial future into the spotlight, Polish President Karol Nawrocki has vetoed the highly contentious Crypto-Asset Market Act, branding it a dangerous threat to civil liberties and economic innovation. The veto, announced late Monday, sets the stage for a fierce constitutional clash and has cleaved the Polish political landscape into two opposing camps: one heralding it as a victory for freedom, the other condemning it as an invitation to financial chaos.
The President's Stand: A Defense of Freedom and Innovation
President Nawrocki's veto was not a mere procedural step, but a forceful ideological declaration. His office issued a blistering critique of the bill, which had previously cleared parliamentary approval, framing the decision as a necessary defense of core Polish values.
The President's core objections are threefold:
1- The Draconian Website-Blocking Power: The bill granted authorities sweeping, opaque powers to block websites operating in the crypto market with minimal oversight. "This provision creates a tool for censorship that can be easily abused," the presidential statement argued. It is a direct threat to digital freedoms and sets a dangerous precedent that undermines the openness of the internet in Poland.
2- A Bureaucratic Monster of "Overregulation": The president lambasted the bill's extreme complexity—a dense, sprawling document that critics say only lobbyists and lawyers could love. This is not regulation; this is suffocation, Nawrocki stated. He contrasted Poland's approach with the more streamlined, business-friendly frameworks of neighbors like the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Hungary, arguing that the bill would achieve one thing only: "Overregulation is the fastest way to drive innovative companies, talent, and tax revenue to Vilnius, Prague, or Malta.
3- Stifling Competition, Killing the Startup Spirit: A particularly criticized aspect was the structure of prohibitive supervisory fees. The president warned that these fees were calibrated to benefit only deep-pocketed foreign corporations and traditional banks, while crushing domestic Polish startups and entrepreneurs. This is a perverse reversal of logic. Instead of fostering a competitive, homegrown market, it kills it in its cradle. It is a direct attack on Polish innovation and ambition, he asserted.
Political Backlash: Accusations of Choosing Chaos
The veto triggered an immediate and furious response from the heart of the government, revealing a deep rift within the ruling coalition.
1- Finance Minister Andrzej Domański took to X with a stark warning: As a result of abuses in this market, 20% of clients are already losing their money. By vetoing this bill, the President has chosen chaos. He must now bear full responsibility for the consequences. His post was accompanied by charts implying rising consumer risks without regulation.
2- Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski echoed the sentiment, framing the veto as an abandonment of consumer protection. "The purpose of this law was to bring order to the wild west of crypto. When the speculative bubble bursts and thousands of Polish families lose their savings, they will know exactly who to thank, he posted, aiming his remarks directly at the president's constituency.
The government's narrative is clear: the veto leaves Polish consumers dangerously exposed to fraud and market manipulation in a volatile sector, prioritizing ideological purity over practical safety.
Crypto Community Fights Back: A Historic Victory for Common Sense
In stark contrast, the veto was met with jubilation and relief by the Polish crypto industry, libertarian politicians, and digital advocates.
1- Tomasz Mentzen, a prominent pro-crypto politician who had publicly campaigned against the bill, hailed the decision: The President has listened to reason and to the people. This veto protects Poles from becoming a digitally surveilled colony and keeps our economy open to the future.
2- Economist and blockchain expert Krzysztof Piech dismantled the government's criticism. "Holding the president responsible for scams is absurd. That is the job of the police and financial regulators under existing laws, he argued. He also delivered the community's trump card: "The panic is manufactured. The EU's comprehensive MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) regulations come into full force across all member states in July 2026. This rushed, flawed Polish law was unnecessary and would have only created a contradictory, hostile local regime for two years before being superseded by EU law.
What Happens Next? A Nation at a Regulatory Crossroads
The political drama is now entering a new phase with significant implications.
- Legislative Limbo: The bill returns to the lower house of parliament, the Sejm. To override a presidential veto, the government must muster a three-fifths supermajority—a significantly higher threshold than the simple majority used to pass it initially. This will be a major test of the ruling coalition's cohesion and strength.
- The MiCA Shadow: The impending EU-wide MiCA regulations loom large over the debate. Opponents of the vetoed bill ask: If MiCA is coming, why the rush with a potentially harmful national law? Proponents counter that Poland cannot afford a two-year regulatory vacuum where consumers are unprotected.
- Global Signal: Poland, as one of Central Europe's largest economies, is sending a signal to the global crypto industry. The president's veto is being interpreted internationally as a potential openness to a more innovation-friendly approach, potentially attracting projects wary of heavier-handed regimes in other EU nations.
BOTTOM LINE
President Nawrocki's veto is more than a policy dispute; it is a high-stakes battle over Poland's identity in the digital age. It pits a vision of a tightly controlled, state-protected market against one of entrepreneurial freedom and minimal interference, all under the shadow of overarching EU rules. The coming weeks will determine whether Poland's crypto landscape becomes a protected fortress or an open frontier—a decision that will resonate far beyond its borders.
- Buy Crypto in Minutes — Start Trading on BYDFi Today
B22389817 · 2026-01-20 · 4 days agoCrypto Bans in 2026: Where is Bitcoin Still Illegal?
Key Takeaway: The world is splitting into two camps: nations embracing digital assets and nations banning them to protect their central banks. Knowing the difference is vital for global travelers and investors.
In 2026, the narrative around cryptocurrency has shifted dramatically. With major economies like the US, UK, and Hong Kong fully integrating digital assets into their financial systems via ETFs and clear laws, it feels like crypto has won.
But look closer at the map, and you will see a different story.
There are still vast pockets of the world where owning Bitcoin is not just difficult; it is a crime. The global regulatory landscape has fractured. While the West builds bridges to Web3, other nations are building walls. Understanding where these walls are—and why they exist—is critical for anyone navigating the global digital economy.
The Motivations Behind the Ban
Why would a country ban innovation? The answer is rarely about "protecting users" from volatility. It is almost always about control.
Governments in nations with unstable currencies fear Capital Flight. If citizens can easily swap their inflating local currency for Bitcoin or USDT, the local currency collapses even faster.
Furthermore, the rise of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) has created a conflict of interest. Authoritarian regimes want to launch their own digital money that they can track and control. They view decentralized cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin as direct competitors that need to be eliminated to clear the path for their state-backed surveillance coins.
The "Absolute Ban" Countries
In these jurisdictions, everything is illegal. You cannot trade, you cannot pay with crypto, and banks are forbidden from touching it.
China remains the most prominent example. despite being a former hub for mining, the government enacted a sweeping ban on all crypto transactions and mining activities. While citizens still find ways to trade peer-to-peer (P2P), the legal risk is immense.
Egypt and Algeria also maintain strict prohibitions. In Egypt, religious decrees (fatwas) have been issued declaring Bitcoin "haram" (forbidden) due to its speculative nature, backing up the legal ban with cultural and religious pressure.
The "Implicit Ban" (Banking Blockades)
Other countries claim crypto is legal, but they make it impossible to use. This is the "Banking Blockade" strategy.
In countries like Nigeria (historically) or Saudi Arabia, the government might not arrest you for holding a wallet, but they will forbid banks from processing transfers to crypto exchanges.
This forces the market underground. It creates a massive "Shadow Economy" where trading happens entirely via P2P networks or cash-in-person deals. It is a testament to the resilience of crypto: even when the state turns off the banking rails, the people find a way to transact.
The Gray Zone is Shrinking
The good news is that the list of hostile nations is shrinking, not growing.
Countries that were previously skeptical are realizing that bans don't work; they just push tax revenue offshore. We are seeing a trend of "Regulation over Prohibition." Nations are now racing to create frameworks to tax and monitor crypto rather than ban it outright.
They understand that in 2026, banning crypto is like banning the internet in 1995. It doesn't stop the technology; it just ensures your country gets left behind in the digital dark ages.
Navigating the Map
For the digital nomad or the global investor, this patchwork of laws creates complexity. You need to know if your destination allows you to access your funds.
Using a VPN might get you past a firewall, but it won't help you off-ramp fiat if the local banks are hostile. The safest strategy is to operate within jurisdictions that respect property rights and digital innovation.
Conclusion
The geopolitical divide is clear. On one side, we have open financial systems integrating with the blockchain. On the other, we have closed systems fighting a losing battle against decentralized money.
Fortunately, the digital world has no borders. Regardless of where you are physically located, you can access the global economy through the right infrastructure.
Register at BYDFi today to trade on a platform that serves the global community, ensuring you have access to your digital assets whenever and wherever you need them.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Is it illegal to own crypto in China?
A: Owning crypto is technically a gray area, but trading it, mining it, or using it for payments is strictly illegal. Courts have ruled that crypto assets have property status, but commercial activity is banned.Q: Can I travel with my hardware wallet to a banned country?
A: Generally, yes. Customs agents rarely check for Ledger or Trezor devices. However, you may find it impossible to access exchange websites or sell your crypto for local cash once you are inside the country.Q: Why do countries ban crypto?
A: The primary reasons are to prevent capital flight (money leaving the country), to protect a weak local currency, or to eliminate competition for a state-issued Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC).2026-01-23 · 14 hours agoCrypto Phishing Attacks in 2026: How to Spot and Stop Them
Key Takeaways:
- Phishing has evolved from simple fake emails to complex "Ice Phishing" smart contracts.
- Modern "Wallet Drainers" can empty your entire portfolio with a single digital signature.
- The only true defense is a "Zero Trust" mindset and verifying every URL before connecting.
In the early days of the internet, phishing meant getting a poorly spelled email from a "Prince" asking for a bank transfer. You could spot it a mile away.
In 2026, the game has changed. Crypto phishing is no longer about tricking you into sending money; it is about tricking you into granting permission. The attackers have built automated "Wallet Drainer" kits that look identical to legitimate NFT mints or DeFi protocols.
They don't need your password. They don't need your seed phrase. They just need you to click "Confirm" one time.
The New Threat: "Ice Phishing"
Traditional phishing steals your credentials. Ice Phishing steals your approval.
In Web3, when you interact with a dApp (like Uniswap), you often have to sign a transaction approving the contract to spend your tokens. This is standard procedure.
Hackers exploit this. They create a fake website that looks exactly like a legitimate project. When you connect your wallet to claim a "free airdrop," the site pops up a transaction request. It looks standard, but in the background, you aren't claiming a drop. You are signing a "Set Approval for All" transaction. This gives the hacker's smart contract legal permission to move every single USDT or NFT out of your wallet without asking you again.
The Psychology of Urgency
Phishing attacks rely on one specific human emotion: FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out).
Scammers know that crypto moves fast. They will hack a verified Twitter account or Discord server and post a limited-time link: "Surprise Mint! Only 100 spots left! Act fast!"
Your brain switches off its critical thinking centers. You rush to the site, connect your wallet, and sign the transaction before reading the fine print. By the time the "Transaction Successful" notification pops up, your assets are already gone.
Spear Phishing: The Personal Touch
While generic phishing casts a wide net, Spear Phishing is a sniper shot.
This targets high-value individuals. A hacker might spend weeks researching you. They might pose as a job recruiter, a journalist, or a fellow investor. They will send you a PDF "job offer" or a link to a "pitch deck."
Opening that file triggers malware that hunts for your private keys or hijacks your clipboard. It is sophisticated, personalized, and incredibly dangerous because it comes from a source you think you trust.
How to Build an Ironclad Defense
You don't need to be a cybersecurity expert to stay safe, but you do need to follow strict hygiene rules.
1. Bookmark Everything
Never search for a protocol on Google. Scammers buy ads to place fake links at the top of search results. Bookmark the official URL of your favorite exchanges and dApps and only use those bookmarks.2. Read What You Sign
Most modern wallets now attempt to decode transactions for you. If a transaction says "Set Approval for All" or asks for access to an asset you aren't trying to trade, Reject it immediately.3. Use a "Burner" Wallet
Never connect your main cold storage vault to a random dApp. Use a separate "hot wallet" with only a small amount of funds for daily interactions. If that wallet gets drained, your life savings remain untouched.Conclusion
The blockchain is immutable, which means there is no "Undo" button. Once a phishing scammer has your assets, they are gone forever. The technology cannot protect you if you invite the vampire into your house.
Stop clicking random links. Stop chasing "free" airdrops. The safest way to acquire assets is through a secure, centralized environment where these smart contract risks are managed for you.
Register at BYDFi today to trade, buy, and store your crypto on a platform that prioritizes security and protects you from the wild west of DeFi phishing.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Can I get my crypto back after a phishing attack?
A: almost never. Because blockchain transactions are irreversible, unless law enforcement catches the hacker (which is rare), the funds are lost.Q: How do I revoke a malicious permission?
A: You can use tools like Revoke.cash or Etherscan's "Token Approval" tool to scan your wallet and cancel any permissions you gave to suspicious contracts.Q: Does a hardware wallet stop phishing?
A: Not entirely. A hardware wallet keeps your keys offline, but if you physically click "Confirm" on the device to sign a malicious transaction, the hardware wallet will execute it. It protects against malware, not bad decisions.2026-01-23 · 14 hours agoOn-Chain vs. Off-Chain Transactions: Speed vs. Security Explained
On-Chain: The Highway During Rush Hour
An On-Chain transaction occurs directly on the blockchain itself (the "Layer 1").
When you send Ethereum from your hardware wallet to a friend's hardware wallet, that data must be validated by thousands of nodes globally. It has to be packed into a block, verified, and permanently etched into the digital stone of the ledger.
This offers incredible security. Once it is there, no government or hacker can erase it. It is immutable.
But this security comes at a cost: Scalability. Blockchains like Bitcoin and Ethereum have limited space. When everyone tries to use the network at once, a bidding war starts. Gas fees skyrocket, and speeds crawl to a halt. It is like a highway with only one lane; it is safe, but it jams easily.
Off-Chain: The Express Lane
Off-Chain transactions move the activity away from the main blockchain to avoid that congestion.
The most common example of this is a Centralized Exchange (CEX). When you trade on the Spot market at an exchange, you aren't writing data to the blockchain with every trade. That would be too slow and expensive.
Instead, the exchange records the trade in its own internal database. It simply updates a spreadsheet: "Alice -1 BTC, Bob +1 BTC." Because this happens on a private server, it is instant and virtually free. The transaction is only recorded "On-Chain" when you finally decide to withdraw your funds to an external wallet.
Layer 2s and the Future
Beyond exchanges, we now have decentralized off-chain solutions like the Lightning Network for Bitcoin or Rollups (Arbitrum, Base) for Ethereum.
These protocols bundle thousands of transactions together off-chain and then submit just the final result to the main blockchain. It is like buying a coffee every day but only paying the credit card bill once a month.
In 2026, this is how the crypto economy functions. The main blockchain is the "Settlement Layer" (for high-value, slow finality), while Off-Chain layers are the "Execution Layer" (for buying coffee or high-frequency trading).
Which One Should You Use?
It depends on your goal. If you are buying a house or storing your life savings for ten years, use On-Chain transactions. You want the maximum security of the base layer, and you don't care if it costs $5 or takes an hour.
If you are day trading, scalping volatility, or buying small amounts, use Off-Chain solutions. You need the speed. You cannot wait 10 minutes for a trade to settle when the price is moving 5% a minute.
Conclusion
Crypto is no longer a "one size fits all" technology. It has evolved into a layered ecosystem. We have slow, secure layers for settlement and fast, efficient layers for commerce.
Understanding this distinction saves you money. Don't pay high gas fees for small trades. Use the right tool for the job.
Register at BYDFi today to experience the speed of off-chain execution, allowing you to trade globally with deep liquidity and zero network lag.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Is off-chain trading less secure?
A: It involves "counterparty risk." You are trusting the exchange or the Layer 2 protocol to manage the ledger correctly. However, reputable exchanges use cold storage to ensure assets are backed 1:1.Q: Why are gas fees so high on-chain?
A: Blockchains have limited space. Gas fees are an auction; you are paying to cut the line. If many people want to use the network, the price to enter the next block goes up.Q: Is the Lightning Network on-chain or off-chain?
A: It is off-chain. It opens a payment channel between users to transact instantly, and only records the opening and closing balance on the Bitcoin blockchain.2026-01-23 · 14 hours ago
BYDFi Official Blog
Popular Tags
Popular Questions
How to Use Bappam TV to Watch Telugu, Tamil, and Hindi Movies?
How to Withdraw Money from Binance to a Bank Account in the UAE?
ISO 20022 Coins: What They Are, Which Cryptos Qualify, and Why It Matters for Global Finance
Bitcoin Dominance Chart: Your Guide to Crypto Market Trends in 2025
The Best DeFi Yield Farming Aggregators: A Trader's Guide