List of questions about [China]

The Digital Dollar’s Delicate Moment: How a U.S. Policy Debate Could Cede the Future to China

A quiet but seismic shift is unfolding in the world of digital currency—one that pits the innovation of America’s private sector against the strategic ambition of the Chinese state. At the center of the storm is the GENIUS Act, a landmark U.S. law designed to regulate stablecoins. Now, a brewing debate in the Senate over a single, seemingly technical provision—whether platforms can offer rewards or interest on stablecoin holdings—has escalated into a full-scale warning from the highest levels of crypto industry leadership.

The warning is stark: misstep here, and Washington could inadvertently hand China a decisive edge in the defining financial race of the 21st century.

The Warning From Wall Street's Digital Frontier

The alarm was sounded clearly by Faryar Shirzad, Chief Policy Officer of Coinbase. In a pointed public statement, he framed the Senate’s upcoming negotiations as a pivotal moment for American financial sovereignty. The core of his argument hinges on competition. The GENIUS Act, as passed, wisely prohibited stablecoin issuers from paying direct interest but allowed platforms and third parties to innovate with user rewards. This created a competitive, market-driven model for dollar digital currency.

Now, that model is under threat. Shirzad warns that bank lobbyists are actively pressuring lawmakers to strip these reward mechanisms from the law. Their goal, according to industry observers, is to protect a traditional banking model where banks profit heavily from the spread between the interest they earn (like on Federal Reserve reserves) and the near-zero interest they often pay to everyday savers.

If this issue is mishandled in Senate negotiations,  Shirzad cautions,  it could hand our global rivals a big assist… at the worst possible time.

The Dragon's Move: China Charges Ahead with Digital Yuan 2.0

The timing of this U.S. policy debate could not be more critical, or more perilous. As American lawmakers contemplate restricting innovation, China’s central bank is actively supercharging its own digital currency.

This week, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) unveiled a transformative upgrade to the digital yuan (e-CNY). Starting January 1, 2026, commercial banks will be permitted to pay interest on balances held in digital yuan wallets. This is not a minor tweak; it is a fundamental evolution.

Deputy Governor Lu Lei declared this moves the e-CNY from the  digital cash era  into the  digital deposit currency era. In practical terms, it transforms China’s CBDC from a simple digital payment tool into a full-fledged, interest-bearing savings vehicle—one integrated directly into the core of the national banking system. It gains the classic functions of money: a store of value, a unit of account, and a powerful instrument for cross-border payment.

Suddenly, the global proposition changes. Why would an international user or corporation hold a static, non-yielding digital dollar when China offers a state-backed, interest-bearing digital alternative?

The Battle Lines Are Drawn: Innovation vs. Incumbency

The conflict in Washington is a classic clash between disruptive innovation and entrenched power.

On one side stands a coalition of banks seeking to maintain their traditional, highly profitable deposit-taking model. Crypto policy commentator Max Avery summarized their position starkly: banks currently enjoy a massive subsidy from near-zero-interest consumer deposits, while earning significant returns elsewhere. Yield-bearing stablecoins directly threaten that lucrative spread by offering users a fair share of the returns generated by their assets.

On the other side stand companies like Coinbase and a broad swath of the crypto industry, arguing that crippling U.S. stablecoins is a catastrophic strategic error. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has drawn a  red line,  calling the banking lobby’s efforts  unethical  and vowing fierce opposition. He argues banks are short-sighted, predicting they will eventually want to offer yield on stablecoins themselves once they understand the new market reality.

Armstrong’s surprise is palpable:  I can’t believe they are being this blatant about lobbying to kill a competitive product to protect their oligopoly.

The Stakes: More Than Crypto, It's Currency Itself

This is far more than a niche policy debate about cryptocurrency rewards. This is a battle for the future structure of global finance.

1- The U.S. Path: A potentially neutered digital dollar, limited by law from competing on features, could see its global adoption stagnate. Stablecoins—the most successful application of blockchain technology to date—could be hamstrung just as they begin to revolutionize cross-border trade and payments.

2- The Chinese Path: A state-managed digital currency, now with interest-bearing features, strategically deployed to deepen financial control at home and expand influence abroad through digital infrastructure deals and trade partnerships.

The outcome will answer a fundamental question: Will the next generation of digital money be shaped by open-market innovation and private competition, or by state-led design and strategic control?