How does Near compare to Ethereum in terms of scalability?

3 answers

• SuciFthiraDec 29, 2024 · a year ago
  Near and Ethereum are both popular blockchain platforms, but they differ in terms of scalability. Near uses a sharding technique called Nightshade, which allows it to process a large number of transactions in parallel. This makes Near highly scalable and capable of handling thousands of transactions per second. On the other hand, Ethereum currently faces scalability challenges due to its limited throughput. The Ethereum community is actively working on solutions like Ethereum 2.0, which aims to introduce sharding and other scalability improvements. However, Near has a clear advantage in terms of scalability at the moment.
  629

  315
• AYCHA YAHIADec 19, 2021 · 4 years ago
  When it comes to scalability, Near outshines Ethereum. Near's Nightshade sharding technique enables it to achieve high transaction throughput, making it a more scalable blockchain platform compared to Ethereum. With Near, developers can build decentralized applications that can handle a large number of transactions without compromising on performance. Ethereum, on the other hand, has been facing scalability issues due to its current design. However, Ethereum 2.0, which is currently under development, aims to address these scalability challenges and improve the platform's performance.
  590

  197
• Rafi JatnikaOct 26, 2020 · 5 years ago
  As an expert in the field, I can confidently say that Near is more scalable than Ethereum. Near's Nightshade sharding technique allows it to process transactions in parallel, resulting in high throughput and improved scalability. Ethereum, on the other hand, has been struggling with scalability issues, especially during periods of high network congestion. While Ethereum 2.0 promises to bring significant scalability improvements, Near currently offers a more scalable solution for developers and users alike.
  511

  128