How does the consensus mechanism of IOTA differ from that of Raiblocks?

3 answers

• Lewis WeeksJan 22, 2026 · 25 days ago
  IOTA and Raiblocks have different consensus mechanisms. IOTA uses a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) called the Tangle, while Raiblocks uses a block-lattice structure. The Tangle allows for parallel processing of transactions and eliminates the need for miners, making it more scalable and energy-efficient. On the other hand, Raiblocks' block-lattice structure enables fast and feeless transactions, with each account having its own blockchain. Both mechanisms have their advantages and disadvantages, and their suitability depends on the specific use case.
  554

  277
• LuckIhatovApr 20, 2024 · 2 years ago
  The consensus mechanism of IOTA, known as the Tangle, differs from that of Raiblocks in terms of structure and approach. While IOTA uses a DAG-based system where each transaction confirms two previous transactions, Raiblocks employs a block-lattice structure where each account has its own blockchain. This difference in structure affects factors such as scalability, transaction speed, and security. It's important to note that both mechanisms aim to provide efficient and decentralized transaction processing, but they achieve it through different means.
  556

  186
• Jalla LikithaOct 24, 2025 · 4 months ago
  When it comes to the consensus mechanism, IOTA and Raiblocks take different approaches. IOTA's Tangle is designed to achieve consensus through a decentralized network of nodes, where each transaction confirms two previous transactions. This approach eliminates the need for miners and allows for parallel processing of transactions. On the other hand, Raiblocks' block-lattice structure ensures fast and feeless transactions by having each account maintain its own blockchain. Both mechanisms have their strengths and weaknesses, and their suitability depends on the specific requirements of the application or use case.
  620

  155