How does the consensus mechanism of Neblio differ from that of Ethereum, and how does it impact the security and decentralization of the respective networks?

1 answers

• Manraj GurjarAug 18, 2020 · 5 years ago
  When comparing the consensus mechanisms of Neblio and Ethereum, we find significant differences. Neblio utilizes Proof of Stake Velocity (PoSV), while Ethereum relies on Proof of Work (PoW). PoSV combines staking and velocity to secure the network, whereas PoW requires miners to solve complex mathematical puzzles. This difference impacts security and decentralization. PoSV reduces the risk of a 51% attack, as it requires an attacker to control a majority of the token supply and maintain high velocity. In contrast, PoW can be vulnerable to attacks by entities with significant computational power. Additionally, PoSV promotes decentralization by allowing a wider range of participants to contribute to the network's security without the need for expensive mining equipment. Overall, Neblio's consensus mechanism offers improved security and decentralization compared to Ethereum's PoW mechanism.
  900

  450