How does the consensus mechanism of Zilliqa differ from that of Solana?

3 answers

• RATAKONDA CHARANYANov 14, 2024 · a year ago
  Zilliqa and Solana have different consensus mechanisms. Zilliqa uses a consensus algorithm called Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT), which is a classic consensus algorithm that ensures safety and liveness in a distributed system. On the other hand, Solana uses a unique consensus mechanism called Proof of History (PoH), which combines elements of Proof of Stake (PoS) and Proof of Work (PoW). PoH provides a verifiable and time-ordered sequence of events, allowing Solana to achieve high throughput and low latency. In summary, Zilliqa relies on PBFT for consensus, while Solana utilizes PoH to achieve its consensus.
  627

  314
• Bruna NascimentoAug 03, 2022 · 4 years ago
  The consensus mechanisms of Zilliqa and Solana differ in their approach to achieving consensus. Zilliqa uses a consensus algorithm that relies on a network of nodes reaching agreement through multiple rounds of voting. This ensures that the majority of nodes agree on the state of the blockchain. On the other hand, Solana's consensus mechanism is based on a decentralized clock called Proof of History, which provides a historical record of events. This allows Solana to achieve fast confirmation times and high scalability. So, while Zilliqa relies on voting-based consensus, Solana uses a unique decentralized clock mechanism.
  629

  210
• ange cedricJul 14, 2021 · 5 years ago
  As an expert in the field, I can tell you that Zilliqa and Solana have different consensus mechanisms. Zilliqa uses a consensus algorithm called Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT), which is a well-established algorithm in the blockchain space. PBFT ensures that the network reaches consensus even in the presence of malicious nodes. On the other hand, Solana uses a consensus mechanism called Proof of History (PoH), which is a novel approach that combines elements of Proof of Stake (PoS) and Proof of Work (PoW). PoH provides a verifiable and time-ordered sequence of events, which is crucial for achieving high throughput and scalability. So, in summary, Zilliqa and Solana have different consensus mechanisms that are tailored to their specific needs.
  763

  191