How does the PPLNS mining pool payout method compare to the PPS method in terms of profitability?

10 answers

• Mahla_AfsharJul 20, 2025 · 24 days ago
  The PPLNS (Pay Per Last N Shares) mining pool payout method and the PPS (Pay Per Share) method are two different ways of distributing rewards to miners. In PPLNS, the payout is based on the number of shares a miner contributes to the pool over a certain period of time, typically the last N shares. This method takes into account the miner's long-term contribution to the pool and rewards them accordingly. On the other hand, PPS pays miners for every valid share they submit, regardless of the pool's luck or the miner's long-term contribution. So, which one is more profitable? It depends on various factors such as the miner's hash rate, the pool's luck, and the current difficulty level. In general, PPLNS tends to be more profitable for miners with a stable and high hash rate, as it rewards long-term contributions. However, PPS can be more profitable for miners with a lower hash rate or during periods of high pool luck. Ultimately, it's important for miners to consider their own mining setup and goals when choosing between the two methods.
  1050

  525
• Ch. Kedhar KiranOct 26, 2024 · 10 months ago
  The PPLNS (Pay Per Last N Shares) mining pool payout method and the PPS (Pay Per Share) method have different approaches to distributing rewards to miners. PPLNS takes into account the number of shares a miner contributes to the pool over a certain period of time, typically the last N shares. This method aims to reward miners based on their long-term contribution to the pool. On the other hand, PPS pays miners for every valid share they submit, regardless of the pool's luck or the miner's long-term contribution. In terms of profitability, it's difficult to say which method is better as it depends on various factors. PPLNS can be more profitable for miners with a stable and high hash rate, as it rewards consistent contributions. However, PPS can be more profitable for miners with a lower hash rate or during periods of high pool luck. Ultimately, miners should consider their own mining setup and goals when choosing between the two methods.
  951

  317
• Justin PaulJun 17, 2022 · 3 years ago
  The PPLNS (Pay Per Last N Shares) mining pool payout method and the PPS (Pay Per Share) method have different approaches to distributing rewards to miners. PPLNS calculates the payout based on the number of shares a miner contributes to the pool over a certain period of time, typically the last N shares. This method aims to reward miners based on their long-term contribution to the pool. On the other hand, PPS pays miners for every valid share they submit, regardless of the pool's luck or the miner's long-term contribution. In terms of profitability, it's important to note that different miners may have different experiences with each method. Some miners may find PPLNS more profitable due to its focus on long-term contributions, while others may prefer PPS for its consistent payouts. Ultimately, it's recommended for miners to try both methods and analyze their own mining results to determine which one is more profitable for their specific setup.
  959

  240
• Arize ValentinrJul 12, 2025 · a month ago
  The PPLNS (Pay Per Last N Shares) mining pool payout method and the PPS (Pay Per Share) method are two popular ways of distributing rewards to miners. PPLNS calculates the payout based on the number of shares a miner contributes to the pool over a certain period of time, typically the last N shares. This method aims to reward miners based on their long-term contribution to the pool. On the other hand, PPS pays miners for every valid share they submit, regardless of the pool's luck or the miner's long-term contribution. In terms of profitability, it's difficult to determine which method is more profitable as it depends on various factors such as the miner's hash rate, the pool's luck, and the current difficulty level. Some miners may find PPLNS more profitable due to its focus on long-term contributions, while others may prefer PPS for its consistent payouts. Ultimately, miners should consider their own mining setup and goals when choosing between the two methods.
  977

  196
• SSPPLL89Aug 27, 2022 · 3 years ago
  The PPLNS (Pay Per Last N Shares) mining pool payout method and the PPS (Pay Per Share) method are two different approaches to distributing rewards to miners. PPLNS calculates the payout based on the number of shares a miner contributes to the pool over a certain period of time, typically the last N shares. This method aims to reward miners based on their long-term contribution to the pool. On the other hand, PPS pays miners for every valid share they submit, regardless of the pool's luck or the miner's long-term contribution. When it comes to profitability, it's important to consider factors such as the miner's hash rate, the pool's luck, and the current difficulty level. PPLNS can be more profitable for miners with a stable and high hash rate, as it rewards long-term contributions. However, PPS can be more profitable for miners with a lower hash rate or during periods of high pool luck. Ultimately, miners should analyze their own mining results and consider their goals to determine which method is more profitable for them.
  1040

  174
• ecofriendlieDec 05, 2024 · 8 months ago
  The PPLNS (Pay Per Last N Shares) mining pool payout method and the PPS (Pay Per Share) method have different approaches to distributing rewards to miners. PPLNS calculates the payout based on the number of shares a miner contributes to the pool over a certain period of time, typically the last N shares. This method aims to reward miners based on their long-term contribution to the pool. On the other hand, PPS pays miners for every valid share they submit, regardless of the pool's luck or the miner's long-term contribution. In terms of profitability, it's important to consider various factors such as the miner's hash rate, the pool's luck, and the current difficulty level. PPLNS can be more profitable for miners with a stable and high hash rate, as it rewards long-term contributions. However, PPS can be more profitable for miners with a lower hash rate or during periods of high pool luck. Ultimately, the choice between the two methods depends on the miner's individual circumstances and goals.
  1007

  144
• NuraJul 06, 2023 · 2 years ago
  The PPLNS (Pay Per Last N Shares) mining pool payout method and the PPS (Pay Per Share) method are two different ways of distributing rewards to miners. PPLNS calculates the payout based on the number of shares a miner contributes to the pool over a certain period of time, typically the last N shares. This method aims to reward miners based on their long-term contribution to the pool. On the other hand, PPS pays miners for every valid share they submit, regardless of the pool's luck or the miner's long-term contribution. In terms of profitability, it's difficult to determine which method is more profitable as it depends on various factors such as the miner's hash rate, the pool's luck, and the current difficulty level. Some miners may find PPLNS more profitable due to its focus on long-term contributions, while others may prefer PPS for its consistent payouts. Ultimately, miners should consider their own mining setup and goals when choosing between the two methods.
  979

  123
• Chesty07Apr 08, 2024 · a year ago
  The PPLNS (Pay Per Last N Shares) mining pool payout method and the PPS (Pay Per Share) method have different approaches to distributing rewards to miners. PPLNS calculates the payout based on the number of shares a miner contributes to the pool over a certain period of time, typically the last N shares. This method aims to reward miners based on their long-term contribution to the pool. On the other hand, PPS pays miners for every valid share they submit, regardless of the pool's luck or the miner's long-term contribution. When it comes to profitability, it's important to consider factors such as the miner's hash rate, the pool's luck, and the current difficulty level. PPLNS can be more profitable for miners with a stable and high hash rate, as it rewards long-term contributions. However, PPS can be more profitable for miners with a lower hash rate or during periods of high pool luck. Ultimately, miners should analyze their own mining results and consider their goals to determine which method is more profitable for them.
  1037

  116
• Arize ValentinrApr 16, 2025 · 4 months ago
  The PPLNS (Pay Per Last N Shares) mining pool payout method and the PPS (Pay Per Share) method are two popular ways of distributing rewards to miners. PPLNS calculates the payout based on the number of shares a miner contributes to the pool over a certain period of time, typically the last N shares. This method aims to reward miners based on their long-term contribution to the pool. On the other hand, PPS pays miners for every valid share they submit, regardless of the pool's luck or the miner's long-term contribution. In terms of profitability, it's difficult to determine which method is more profitable as it depends on various factors such as the miner's hash rate, the pool's luck, and the current difficulty level. Some miners may find PPLNS more profitable due to its focus on long-term contributions, while others may prefer PPS for its consistent payouts. Ultimately, miners should consider their own mining setup and goals when choosing between the two methods.
  977

  98
• ecofriendlieFeb 07, 2025 · 6 months ago
  The PPLNS (Pay Per Last N Shares) mining pool payout method and the PPS (Pay Per Share) method have different approaches to distributing rewards to miners. PPLNS calculates the payout based on the number of shares a miner contributes to the pool over a certain period of time, typically the last N shares. This method aims to reward miners based on their long-term contribution to the pool. On the other hand, PPS pays miners for every valid share they submit, regardless of the pool's luck or the miner's long-term contribution. In terms of profitability, it's important to consider various factors such as the miner's hash rate, the pool's luck, and the current difficulty level. PPLNS can be more profitable for miners with a stable and high hash rate, as it rewards long-term contributions. However, PPS can be more profitable for miners with a lower hash rate or during periods of high pool luck. Ultimately, the choice between the two methods depends on the miner's individual circumstances and goals.
  1007

  92