How does the Sharpe ratio of Ethereum compare to the S&P 500?

3 answers

• Sehested CrowleyMar 06, 2022 · 3 years ago
  The Sharpe ratio is a measure of risk-adjusted return, which takes into account both the return and volatility of an investment. When comparing the Sharpe ratio of Ethereum to the S&P 500, it provides insights into how well Ethereum has performed relative to the overall market. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates a better risk-adjusted return. However, it's important to note that the Sharpe ratio alone should not be the sole factor in making investment decisions. Other factors such as market conditions, diversification, and individual risk tolerance should also be considered.
  578

  289
• Mohamed Reda Eddakkaoui AazibNov 26, 2023 · 2 years ago
  The Sharpe ratio of Ethereum can be compared to that of the S&P 500 to evaluate the risk-adjusted return of both investments. The Sharpe ratio measures the excess return per unit of risk, with a higher ratio indicating a better risk-adjusted return. By comparing the Sharpe ratios of Ethereum and the S&P 500, investors can assess which investment has provided better returns relative to the level of risk taken. It's important to note that past performance is not indicative of future results, and investors should conduct thorough research and consider their own investment goals and risk tolerance before making any investment decisions.
  640

  214
• The CoffeegrammerDec 15, 2020 · 5 years ago
  When comparing the Sharpe ratio of Ethereum to the S&P 500, it's important to consider the time period and data used for the calculation. The Sharpe ratio is calculated using historical data, and different time periods may yield different results. Additionally, the Sharpe ratio is just one metric to consider when evaluating investments. Other factors such as liquidity, market conditions, and individual risk tolerance should also be taken into account. As an investor, it's important to conduct thorough research and consider multiple factors before making any investment decisions.
  585

  147