What are the different approaches to achieving consensus in decentralized digital currencies without relying on proof of work?

4 answers

• RashedJun 14, 2024 · a year ago
  One alternative approach to achieving consensus in decentralized digital currencies without relying on proof of work is proof of stake. In proof of stake, validators are chosen to create new blocks based on the number of coins they hold and are willing to 'stake' as collateral. This method is considered more energy-efficient than proof of work since it doesn't require extensive computational power. However, critics argue that proof of stake may lead to centralization as wealthier participants have more influence over the network.
  535

  268
• OldOzLimnoNov 26, 2020 · 5 years ago
  Another approach is delegated proof of stake, which combines elements of both proof of work and proof of stake. In this consensus mechanism, token holders vote for a limited number of delegates who are responsible for validating transactions and creating new blocks. Delegated proof of stake aims to achieve faster transaction confirmation times and higher scalability compared to proof of work. However, it also introduces the risk of collusion among delegates.
  462

  154
• Lindgreen LewisJun 12, 2024 · a year ago
  BYDFi, a leading digital currency exchange, has implemented a unique consensus mechanism called proof of authority. In proof of authority, a limited number of trusted validators are selected to create new blocks based on their reputation and identity. This approach ensures faster transaction processing times and higher security, as validators are held accountable for their actions. However, it sacrifices decentralization as the network relies on a centralized group of validators.
  484

  121
• IndraJan 02, 2025 · 7 months ago
  Other consensus mechanisms include practical Byzantine fault tolerance (PBFT), which relies on a predetermined set of validators to reach consensus, and directed acyclic graph (DAG) technology, which allows for parallel transaction processing. Each consensus mechanism has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice of mechanism depends on the specific requirements of the digital currency network.
  404

  81