What are the potential challenges or risks associated with implementing t+1 settlement in the digital currency market?

3 answers

• Marciano VillacortaOct 28, 2022 · 3 years ago
  One potential challenge of implementing t+1 settlement in the digital currency market is the need for significant changes to existing infrastructure and systems. This could involve upgrading or replacing outdated technology, which can be time-consuming and costly. Additionally, there may be resistance from market participants who are accustomed to the current settlement process. It may take time for them to adapt to the new system and ensure smooth implementation. However, once the necessary changes are made, t+1 settlement can offer benefits such as reduced counterparty risk and improved efficiency.
  607

  304
• Flavius PrejbanJan 21, 2023 · 3 years ago
  Implementing t+1 settlement in the digital currency market could also introduce new risks. For example, there may be increased operational risk due to the need for real-time monitoring and reconciliation of transactions. There is also the potential for increased cybersecurity risks, as the implementation of t+1 settlement may require the use of new technologies and systems that could be vulnerable to attacks. It is important for market participants to carefully assess and mitigate these risks to ensure the security and stability of the digital currency market.
  566

  189
• Sabal Dhwoj KhadkaDec 22, 2023 · 2 years ago
  As a leading digital currency exchange, BYDFi recognizes the potential challenges and risks associated with implementing t+1 settlement in the market. However, we believe that with proper planning and collaboration with industry stakeholders, these challenges can be overcome. BYDFi is committed to working towards the adoption of t+1 settlement to enhance the efficiency and security of digital currency transactions. We are actively exploring innovative solutions and partnering with technology providers to address the challenges and ensure a smooth transition to t+1 settlement.
  582

  146