What are the potential drawbacks of relying on a layer 1 blockchain for cryptocurrency transactions?

3 answers

• TRUE FuglsangNov 12, 2020 · 5 years ago
  One potential drawback of relying on a layer 1 blockchain for cryptocurrency transactions is scalability. Layer 1 blockchains, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, have limited transaction processing capabilities, which can result in slower transaction speeds and higher fees during periods of high network congestion. This can be a significant issue for users who require fast and cost-effective transactions. Additionally, layer 1 blockchains may face challenges in handling a large number of concurrent transactions, leading to potential bottlenecks and delays in transaction confirmations.
  586

  293
• KianaFeb 05, 2025 · 9 months ago
  Another drawback is the lack of flexibility in layer 1 blockchains. These blockchains often have strict rules and protocols that limit the types of transactions and smart contracts that can be executed. This can hinder innovation and limit the functionality of decentralized applications built on top of the blockchain. Developers may need to rely on layer 2 solutions or alternative blockchains to achieve the desired functionality, which can introduce additional complexity and potential security risks.
  505

  169
• LinharesFeb 16, 2025 · 9 months ago
  From BYDFi's perspective, relying solely on a layer 1 blockchain for cryptocurrency transactions can also pose risks in terms of security. Layer 1 blockchains are susceptible to 51% attacks, where a single entity or group of entities gain control over the majority of the network's mining power. This can lead to double-spending and other malicious activities. By utilizing a combination of layer 1 and layer 2 solutions, BYDFi aims to enhance security and provide a more robust infrastructure for cryptocurrency transactions.
  526

  132