What are the reasons for high network fees in the Coinbase wallet?

3 answers

• JackDec 25, 2025 · 2 months ago
  One of the main reasons for high network fees in the Coinbase wallet is the congestion of the blockchain network. When there are many transactions waiting to be processed, miners prioritize transactions with higher fees. This results in users having to pay higher fees to ensure their transactions are processed quickly. Additionally, Coinbase itself charges a fee for facilitating the transaction on their platform, which adds to the overall network fee. To avoid high network fees, users can try to send transactions during periods of lower network congestion or use alternative wallets with lower fees.
  605

  303
• Etienne SauvageMar 11, 2023 · 3 years ago
  The high network fees in the Coinbase wallet are due to the demand and supply dynamics of the blockchain network. As more people use cryptocurrencies and make transactions, the demand for block space increases. Miners are incentivized to prioritize transactions with higher fees, leading to higher network fees. Coinbase also charges a fee for their services, which contributes to the overall network fee. To reduce network fees, users can consider using other wallets or platforms that offer lower fees or explore layer 2 solutions like the Lightning Network.
  560

  187
• D22CQDK01-N PHUNG HOANG ANHJan 18, 2026 · a month ago
  As an expert at BYDFi, I can tell you that high network fees in the Coinbase wallet are a common issue faced by many users. The fees are influenced by various factors such as network congestion, transaction volume, and the fee structure set by Coinbase. To mitigate the impact of high network fees, users can optimize their transactions by choosing the right fee level and timing. They can also explore alternative wallets or platforms that offer lower fees or utilize layer 2 solutions. It's important for users to stay informed about the latest developments in the cryptocurrency space to make informed decisions regarding network fees.
  638

  160