Which crypto custody providers offer insurance coverage for digital assets?

3 answers

• Ojilvie Campos AlonsoJan 21, 2022 · 4 years ago
  Sure! There are several crypto custody providers that offer insurance coverage for digital assets. One of the well-known providers is Coinbase Custody. They offer insurance coverage for digital assets held in their custody. Another option is BitGo. They also provide insurance coverage for digital assets stored in their custody. It's important to note that the specific terms and coverage may vary between providers, so it's always a good idea to review the details before making a decision. Keep in mind that insurance coverage is just one aspect to consider when choosing a custody provider. It's also important to evaluate their security measures and reputation in the industry.
  682

  341
• KietApr 18, 2025 · 7 months ago
  Absolutely! When it comes to insurance coverage for digital assets, you have a few options. One of the popular choices is Gemini Custody. They offer insurance coverage for digital assets held in their custody, providing an added layer of protection. Another option is Ledger Vault. They also provide insurance coverage for digital assets stored in their custody. It's worth noting that insurance coverage may have certain limitations and exclusions, so it's essential to carefully review the terms and conditions to understand what is covered and what is not.
  559

  187
• eren akayFeb 10, 2025 · 9 months ago
  Yes, there are several crypto custody providers that offer insurance coverage for digital assets. One such provider is BYDFi. They offer comprehensive insurance coverage for digital assets stored in their custody. This means that in the event of theft, loss, or other covered incidents, your digital assets are protected. It's important to note that insurance coverage is just one aspect to consider when choosing a custody provider. You should also evaluate factors such as security measures, reputation, and user experience to ensure the best fit for your needs.
  564

  141