Which is more cost-effective for cryptocurrency mining, 1080 or 1660?

3 answers

• Jacinta UzoechinaOct 05, 2020 · 5 years ago
  In my experience, the 1080 is generally considered to be more cost-effective for cryptocurrency mining compared to the 1660. The 1080 offers higher hash rates and better power efficiency, which can result in higher mining profits. However, it's important to consider the upfront cost of the graphics card and the electricity consumption. Make sure to calculate the potential return on investment before making a decision.
  421

  211
• Bhawana RakshitAug 29, 2025 · 7 months ago
  I've tried both the 1080 and the 1660 for cryptocurrency mining, and I personally found the 1080 to be more cost-effective. It provided better performance and generated higher profits. However, it's worth noting that the 1660 is a newer model and may have better power efficiency. It's always a good idea to do some research and compare the specifications and benchmarks of both cards before making a decision.
  410

  137
• Golnaaz MirzaeeAug 24, 2024 · 2 years ago
  Based on the data and feedback from our users at BYDFi, the 1080 has been the preferred choice for cost-effective cryptocurrency mining. Its higher hash rates and power efficiency make it a reliable option for maximizing mining profits. However, it's important to consider other factors such as electricity costs and the current market conditions. Ultimately, it's recommended to analyze the specific requirements and budget before choosing a graphics card for mining.
  468

  117