CoinTalk
A total of 1749 cryptocurrency questions
Share Your Thoughts with BYDFi
Trending
Market Makers vs. Market Takers: Understanding Crypto Trading Fees
When you look at a trading screen, it looks like a chaotic wall of flashing numbers. But behind the scenes, every trade falls into one of two categories: Makers or Takers.
Understanding this distinction isn't just academic; it directly impacts your wallet. Exchanges use a "Maker-Taker" fee model, meaning the price you pay for a trade depends on whether you are providing liquidity to the market or taking it away.
The Engine of the Market: Liquidity
To understand the difference, you first need to understand the Order Book. This is the list of all buy and sell orders waiting to be filled.
- Liquidity: This represents how easy it is to buy or sell an asset without moving the price.
- The Ecosystem: A healthy market needs both makers (who put orders on the book) and takers (who fill those orders).
Who is the Market Maker?
A Market Maker is a trader who provides liquidity. They place "Limit Orders" that do not execute immediately. For example, if Bitcoin is at $95,000, a Maker might place a buy order at $94,500.
That order sits in the order book, adding depth to the market. Because Makers help the exchange by ensuring there is always liquidity available, they are often rewarded with lower trading fees (or sometimes even rebates).
If you are a patient trader looking to optimize your entry points on the BYDFi Spot market, acting as a Maker is the most cost-effective strategy.
Who is the Market Taker?
A Market Taker is a trader who demands immediate execution. They place "Market Orders" that buy or sell instantly at the current best available price.
Takers "take" liquidity off the order book. Because they reduce the available supply of orders, exchanges typically charge them a slightly higher fee. Takers prioritize speed over price precision. If you see a breakout and use the Quick Buy feature to catch the rally immediately, you are acting as a Taker.
Why the Distinction Matters
For high-volume traders, the difference between Maker fees and Taker fees can add up to thousands of dollars a year.
- Limit Orders (Maker): Use these when you have a specific price target and are willing to wait.
- Market Orders (Taker): Use these when getting into the trade now is more important than the specific price (e.g., during a news event).
Conclusion
Whether you are "making" the market or "taking" from it, the most important thing is having a platform that executes your strategy flawlessly.
To experience deep liquidity and competitive fee structures, Register at BYDFi today and start trading on a professional-grade order book.
Q&A: Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Is it better to be a Maker or a Taker?
A: Financially, being a Maker is cheaper due to lower fees. However, being a Taker is better if you need to enter or exit a position instantly during high volatility.
Q: Can I be both a Maker and a Taker?
A: Yes. Most traders switch between the two strategies depending on market conditions and urgency.
Q: Do all exchanges use this fee model?
A: Most professional centralized exchanges utilize the Maker-Taker model to incentivize deep liquidity.
2026-01-16 · 8 days ago0 0172Waters Demands SEC Crypto Hearing
The Waters Rise: A Political Showdown Over Crypto's Future Erupts in Washington
The quiet halls of Washington are crackling with the energy of a brewing storm, a low hum of tension that has been building for months now finally finding its release. At the epicenter is a fierce battle over the soul of American crypto regulation, a conflict that pits progressive skepticism against conservative pragmatism, old-world financial guardianship against new-world digital innovation. Representative Maxine Waters has just thrown a lit match into this long-prepared powder keg, and the ensuing conflagration promises to illuminate the path forward for an entire asset class.
This is not merely a policy disagreement; it is a fundamental philosophical clash about risk, freedom, and the architecture of the future economy. The reverberations will be felt from the trading floors of Wall Street to the digital wallets of retail investors across the nation, setting a precedent that will either unshackle a technological revolution or seek to constrain it within the rigid frameworks of the past.
In a scathing letter that reads more like a declaration of war than staid bureaucratic correspondence, Waters is demanding immediate and unequivocal answers from the Securities and Exchange Commission, an agency she believes has lost its way. Her target is precise and glaring: the agency's dramatic, jarring U-turn under its new Trump-appointed chairman, Paul Atkins.
Gone are the days of Gary Gensler's relentless regulation by enforcement, a period characterized by a barrage of lawsuits and a posture of deep-seated suspicion. In its place, a new, unexpectedly friendlier SEC has emerged, one that has quietly but decisively begun shelving landmark legal cases against the industry's most prominent and systemically important giants. This shift is not a minor course correction; it is a wholesale reversal of navigational charts in the middle of a storm, leaving observers, participants, and critics alike scrambling to understand the new destination.
A Stunning Reversal Sparks Fury and Questions of Integrity
Waters’ outrage is palpable, emanating from every line of her detailed missive. She points to a pattern she deems not just alarming but indicative of a deeper institutional malfunction: the sudden, seemingly coordinated dismissal of major enforcement actions against crypto titans like BYDFi and Binance, and against influential individuals like Justin Sun. These were not trivial matters; they were foundational cases meant to establish legal boundaries for the entire digital asset ecosystem. Their disappearance from the SEC's docket is, in her view, an abdication of responsibility.
Even more startling, however, are her grave allegations that some companies publicly celebrated their legal victories before the SEC's commissioners had even convened for the official vote—a chilling detail that hints at undisclosed backchannel communications, a possible breach of protocol, and a pre-ordained shift in policy that bypasses proper governance. This allegation strikes at the heart of regulatory integrity, suggesting a process compromised by external influence or internal predetermination.
For an agency tasked with protecting investors, this rapid dismantling of enforcement sends a dangerous signal," Waters warns, her words carrying the weight of decades of financial oversight. Her message is crystalline: she perceives this abrupt change not as thoughtful, deliberate reform born of new understanding, but as a reckless disarmament in the face of well-documented potential fraud. It is a strategic retreat at the very moment she believes the agency should be fortifying its defenses, a move that she fears will be interpreted as a license for misconduct by bad actors lurking in the digital shadows.
Ten Battlegrounds for Crypto's Soul: A Blueprint for Confrontation
Waters is not merely voicing vague, emotional concerns. She is a seasoned legislator, and she has laid out a ten-point battlefield for the impending oversight hearing, a structured agenda for confrontation that demands scrutiny on everything from the SEC's newfound independence—or its alarming erosion—to the deliberate weakening of critical market surveillance mechanisms crafted to protect the integrity of the financial system. The core, searing question she wants answered echoes in the silent chambers of power: How does the SEC now intend to deter fraud and manipulation in a multi-trillion dollar market it appears to be consciously and deliberately stepping back from? This question is the crux of the entire debate. It challenges the very premise of the SEC's new approach, demanding a blueprint for protection in an era of perceived regulatory retreat.
This hearing, if and when it is convened, will not be a dry recitation of testimony and technical jargon. It will be a proxy war for the future of finance, a theatrical and high-stakes debate where Waters represents a faction deeply and historically skeptical of crypto's wild west reputation. It will be a clash of narratives: one of innovation stifled by overreach versus one of investors endangered by underreach. Every question will be a probe, every answer dissected for hints of ideology or incompetence. The spectacle will draw the attention of the nation, framing the public perception of cryptocurrency at a critical juncture in its adoption curve.
A New Era Dawns at the SEC: From Adversary to Architect—Your Window of Opportunity is NOW
The contrast between the past and present SEC could not be sharper or more profound. Since Chairman Atkins assumed the helm in April, the agency's tone, posture, and priorities have undergone a transformation so complete it resembles a corporate takeover. The once-relentless legal onslaught has stalled; high-profile investigations have gone quiet, fading into the background noise. In their place, proactive gestures have emerged. The regulatory door, once bolted shut, has swung decisively open for spot crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs), a move of monumental symbolic and practical importance. Initiatives publicly branded like "Project Crypto" suggest a strategic pivot away from punitive lawsuits and toward proactive, collaborative framework-building—an attempt to construct the rules of the road rather than merely penalize those driving without a map.
For the long-beleaguered crypto industry, this has been nothing short of a welcome and liberating thaw after a protracted regulatory winter. It is interpreted as validation, a signal that sophisticated regulators are finally beginning to engage with the technology's nuances rather than dismiss its entirety. This creates a historic window of opportunity—a moment where regulatory pressure is receding just as institutional adoption is surging. This convergence may not last. Political winds shift, and the regulatory thaw could reverse if power changes hands. Therefore, this precise moment in time is critical for action. The time to position yourself is not after the rules are fully written and the institutional players have captured all the early gains; the time is now, during this period of clarity and openness.
Seize the Moment with BYDFi : Your Direct Gateway to the Digital Economy
While the political theater unfolds in Washington, you don't need to wait for a final act. The infrastructure to participate in this financial revolution is already here, mature and accessible. This is where BYDFi transcends being just another platform—it becomes your essential partner in capitalizing on this unique regulatory moment. BYDFi is engineered for this exact convergence: a user-centric, secure, and intuitive gateway that turns political uncertainty into personal opportunity.
Don't just watch the debate—take command of your financial future with three simple steps on BYDFi
1- BUY in Seconds: Convert your USD directly into the foundational assets of the future. With ByDFi's seamless interface, you can buy Bitcoin (BTC) to own the digital gold standard, purchase Ethereum (ETH) to gain exposure to the world's leading smart contract platform, or diversify into other top cryptocurrencies. The process is faster and more straightforward than opening a traditional brokerage account.
2- SECURE Your Digital Wealth: ByDFi prioritizes the security of your assets. Utilize their robust custody solutions to ensure your investments are protected with institutional-grade technology while maintaining the accessibility you need.
3- GROW Your Understanding and Portfolio: Use this moment of regulatory clarity to build knowledge alongside your portfolio. BYDFi provides the tools and market access not just to hold, but to engage with the growing digital economy.
The debate in Congress is about control. Your actions are about empowerment. The signals are clear and converging into an urgent call to action:
1- The institutional giants are moving in. BlackRock and Fidelity are already here with their ETFs. The early adopter advantage for the average person is narrowing every day.
2- The regulatory barriers are evolving. This current pause in aggressive enforcement is your clearest runway.
3- The technology is maturing. Platforms like BYDFi have refined the user experience, making it safe and simple to start.
To hesitate now is to consciously forfeit this aligned moment of opportunity. It is to watch from the sidelines as the most significant wealth-creation event of the digital age accelerates without you.
The market is open. The opportunity is clear. The tools are at your fingertips. Start your journey with BYDFi now.
2026-01-16 · 8 days ago0 0402026 Crypto Bull Market Fueled by Store-of-Value Demand and Regulatory Shifts
The 2026 Surge: How a Shifting Financial World and Tech Titans Will Unleash the Next Crypto Mega-Boom
Forget everything you thought you knew about market cycles. The landscape is transforming, and a powerful convergence of economic necessity and technological inevitability is setting the stage for a historic bull run in 2026. This isn't just about speculation; it's a fundamental pivot in how the world perceives and uses value.
The Macroeconomic Engine: A Flight to Real Value
The traditional financial system is showing deep cracks. Soaring government debt, unchecked fiscal spending, and the silent erosion of fiat currency purchasing power are no longer distant concerns—they are today's reality. This macro pressure is forcing a profound portfolio shift.
Investors, from institutions to individuals, are seeking sanctuaries beyond traditional stocks and bonds. They are searching for assets with provable scarcity and independence from monetary policy whims. This relentless demand for a true store of value is the primary rocket fuel for the coming surge, with Bitcoin leading this charge as digital gold for the modern age. These imbalances won't be solved overnight; they will accelerate the migration into digital assets through 2026 and beyond.
The Regulatory Catalyst: Clarity Unlocks the Floodgates
While the macro environment creates the need, regulatory clarity will provide the permission. The United States is on the verge of a landmark shift. After political delays, a bipartisan consensus is building to establish clear, federal rules for the digital asset space in early 2026.
This is not merely about compliance; it's about unleashing institutional innovation. Imagine a world where Fortune 500 companies tokenize their balance sheets, issuing digital assets alongside traditional stocks and bonds. Startups and mature firms alike will embrace tokenization as a standard tool for capital formation and user engagement. The legal green light will transform crypto from a niche asset class into a foundational layer of corporate finance and the broader internet economy.
The Adoption Tsunami: From Big Tech to Your Bank
The true explosion will come from mainstream integration, making crypto accessible to billions. The visionaries at firms like Dragonfly predict that 2026 will be the year a tech behemoth—a Google, Apple, or Meta—integrates a native crypto wallet, seamlessly onboarding its entire user base.
Simultaneously, the world's largest financial institutions are moving beyond experiments. Banks like JPMorgan and Bank of America are building the next generation of financial infrastructure on private, permissioned blockchains that connect to public networks. This fusion of private enterprise with public blockchain security, using tech stacks from Avalanche, OP Stack, and ZK Stack, will bring unprecedented liquidity and real-world utility.
The Final Thought: This Is Your Moment
History rarely offers a clear signal. But right now, the signs are converging into a single, undeniable message: a fundamental restructuring of global finance and technology is underway. The search for genuine value, the push for clear rules, and the inevitable embrace by tech and banking giants aren't separate stories—they are chapters in the same book.
The narrative for 2026 isn't being written by speculators; it's being authored by macroeconomic forces, policymakers, and the world's most influential corporations. They are all moving toward the same conclusion: digital assets are becoming part of the core infrastructure of our future.
This isn't about predicting the next short-term spike. It's about recognizing a long-term directional shift. The window to understand this shift and position yourself intelligently is open now.
Your Gateway to the Boom: The BYDFi Advantage
This evolution presents a monumental opportunity. But to navigate this new landscape, you need a partner that combines access, security, and insight. This is where BYDFi stands apart.
As the surge toward 2026 gains momentum, BYDFi is your essential platform to position yourself. It provides the secure and intuitive gateway to buy Bitcoin, Ethereum, and the next wave of transformative digital assets that will benefit from regulatory clarity and corporate adoption. BYDFi empowers you to move beyond just trading—it’s about building a portfolio aligned with the future of finance.
The pieces are in motion: a search for sound money, impending regulatory frameworks, and the imminent embrace by the world's most powerful companies. The shift is inevitable. The question is, will you be ready when the tide rises in 2026?
The future of value is being rewritten. Don't just watch it happen—participate. Begin your journey at BYDFi today.
2026-01-16 · 8 days ago0 043Onchain perpetual futures see explosive growth in trading
A Defining Moment for Decentralization: Flow's Rollback Reversal and the Unyielding Power of Community Voice
The cryptocurrency landscape was rocked this weekend by a seismic event that transcended a mere security breach. The Flow blockchain, a network designed for scalability and mainstream adoption, found itself at the epicenter of a profound philosophical crisis following a sophisticated $3.9 million exploit. What unfolded was not just a race to recover funds, but a dramatic clash between expediency and principle, culminating in a stunning governance reversal that may redefine how blockchain communities handle future crises.
The initial response from the Flow Foundation was one of decisive, top-down action: a proposed rollback of the layer-1 chain. In technical terms, this meant orchestrating a blockchain reorganization—effectively rewriting recent history to invalidate the malicious transactions and restore stolen assets. For many traditional institutions, this would seem a logical, swift remedy. In the world of decentralized trust, however, it was perceived as nothing short of heresy.
The Community Backlash: A Line Drawn in the Digital Sand
The announcement of the rollback plan ignited an immediate and fiery storm of protest across social platforms and developer forums. The backlash was not merely about the method but the profound precedent it threatened to set. Critics argued that the immutable, unstoppable nature of a blockchain is its cornerstone virtue; to violate that, even in the face of theft, is to undermine the very social contract that attracts users to decentralized systems.
Leading the charge was Alex Smirnov, founder of cross-chain bridge deBridge, whose vocal critique on platform X resonated with a broad swath of the community. He decried the plan as a "rushed decision" with the potential to unleash "financial damage far exceeding the impact of the original exploit." His argument struck a deep chord: if a foundation can rewind the chain once, what stops it from doing so again under different pressures? This, for many, was a slippery slope toward recentralization, transforming the blockchain from a public ledger into a mutable database controlled by a select few.
This wave of dissent was not a marginal murmur but a tidal wave of collective will. Validators, developers, and everyday token holders united in a rare show of consensus, forcing the Foundation to confront an existential question: should they save $3.9 million in assets at the potential cost of $3.9 billion in trust?
The Pivot: A Victory for Principle Over Expediency
In a move that will be studied in future blockchain governance case studies, the Flow Foundation publicly and completely scrapped the rollback plan. Their updated statement was unambiguous and carried the weight of a hard-learned lesson: “There will be no chain reorganization. All legitimate transactions that occurred prior to the halt remain valid and will not require resubmission or reconciliation.”
This declaration was more than a change in tactics; it was a reaffirmation of core values. The Foundation chose to prioritize the long-term integrity of the network's decentralization over a short-term financial recovery. The new path forward is a complex, multi-phase technical recovery plan that acknowledges the messier reality of blockchain security:
1- Immediate Triage: Affected accounts were temporarily restricted, and EVM operations were placed in a read-only state to prevent further movement of exploited funds.
2- Careful Relaunch: The plan involves a meticulous, sequential restart of the network's core components, beginning with its native smart contract language, Cadence.
3- Transparent Timeline: The Foundation has been clear that full recovery will take several days, tempering expectations while committing to continuous updates.
While this approach does not guarantee the recovery of the stolen $3.9 million, it safeguards something arguably more valuable: the network's credibility as a decentralized and immutable ledger.
Market Fallout and the Imperative of Secure Access
The psychological and financial impact was instantaneous and severe. The FLOW token, a barometer of ecosystem confidence, nosedived over 20% in the immediate aftermath, reflecting the market's acute sensitivity to both security flaws and governance instability. This volatility serves as a powerful, real-time lesson in crypto market dynamics, where trust is the most valuable—and most fragile—asset.
For investors and participants, navigating these turbulent waters requires more than just conviction; it demands a foundation of security and reliability in their operational platforms. In times of protocol-level uncertainty, the role of robust, user-focused exchanges becomes paramount. This is where platforms like BYDFi establish their critical value proposition.
BYDFi provides a secure, intuitive, and liquid gateway for users seeking to engage with assets like FLOW or build a resilient digital asset portfolio. In an ecosystem where foundational decisions can shift overnight, having a trustworthy partner for executing trades and safeguarding assets is not just convenient—it's essential. BYDFi's commitment to security protocols and a seamless user experience offers a stabilizing port in the storm, enabling users to make informed decisions and manage their crypto holdings with confidence, irrespective of the turbulence within any single blockchain's governance.
The Road Ahead: A Forged, Not Broken, Network
The Flow exploit and its aftermath have been a brutal, public stress test. The network's technical vulnerabilities were exposed, but its governance model—however strained—proved responsive. As noted by Find Labs, the team behind Flowscan, navigating the crisis required "genuine collaboration between parties under high stress," highlighting the difficult stewardship of balancing action with principle.
The coming days will be critical as Flow executes its recovery plan and the community watches closely. The next update from the Foundation will be scrutinized not just for technical details, but for its tone and transparency. This episode has indelibly marked the Flow blockchain, but it may emerge not broken, but forged stronger—with a hardened commitment to its decentralized ideals and a community that has proven it will hold its stewards accountable. In the grand narrative of Web3, this may be remembered not as Flow's failure, but as the moment it truly learned what decentralization means.
2026-01-16 · 8 days ago0 037The 2026 Shift: Big Tech's Wallet vs. Fintech's Flop
The Great Convergence: How 2026 Will Redefine Crypto, Big Tech, and the Future of Finance
A profound transformation is quietly brewing behind the corporate firewalls of Fortune 100 boardrooms and within the innovation labs of Silicon Valley’s most dominant companies. According to a bold series of predictions from Haseeb Qureshi, the visionary managing partner of crypto venture capital titan Dragonfly, the year 2026 will mark a historic inflection point. This will be the moment when the abstract promise of blockchain technology collides with the immense scale of global industry, triggering a chain reaction that will onboard millions, redefine value transfer, and separate fleeting hype from enduring utility.
The coming era will be defined not by solo pioneers, but by institutional giants stepping onto the chain. Yet, as with every gold rush, not every path will lead to riches. The landscape of 2026 will be a tale of two strategies: one of pragmatic, private integration, and another of ambitious, public competition where only the most robust networks will survive.
The Corporate Forge: Fortune 100 Builds Its Hybrid Future
The most significant shift will originate from the world’s most entrenched financial and technological institutions. Qureshi forecasts that 2026 will witness a decisive move from cautious experimentation to active construction by a swath of Fortune 100 companies. The banking and fintech sectors, in particular, are poised to lead this charge, driven by a need for greater efficiency, transparency, and new programmable revenue streams.
These corporate entities will not seek to become the next Ethereum. Their strategy will be far more pragmatic and immediately valuable. They will leverage the powerful, pre-built toolkits that have emerged from the crypto ecosystem’s relentless innovation—frameworks like Avalanche’s subnet technology, the OP Stack, Arbitrum Orbit, and the ZK Stack. These modular solutions allow giants like JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, or a global logistics firm to spin up private, permissioned blockchains tailored to their specific needs: settling intra-bank transactions, managing complex supply chains, or tokenizing real-world assets.
The genius of this approach lies in its connectivity. These are not walled gardens destined for obsolescence. By design, they will be securely bridged to public blockchains like Ethereum, creating a powerful hybrid model. Sensitive, proprietary data can reside on the private chain, while the public chain acts as a neutral, immutable settlement layer and a gateway to decentralized finance (DeFi) liquidity. This architecture offers the best of both worlds: corporate control and efficiency meets the boundless innovation and security of public networks.
The Onramp for Billions: The Big Tech Wallet Revolution
If corporate blockchains represent the backend revolution, the front-end experience for everyday users is set for an even more dramatic change. Qureshi’s most eye-opening prediction is that 2026 will see one of the Big Tech behemoths—a Google, Apple, or Meta—formally enter the arena by launching or acquiring a native cryptocurrency wallet.
Imagine a future where a crypto wallet is not a separate, daunting application, but a seamless feature integrated into your existing digital life. A Google Wallet that holds digital assets alongside payment cards, built directly into Android. An Apple Crypto service, secured by the Secure Enclave, accessible with Face ID. A Meta wallet facilitating digital commerce across Instagram and the metaverse.
This integration has the potential to achieve what countless crypto startups have strived for over a decade: frictionless, mass adoption. With one click, billions of users who already trust these platforms with their photos, communications, and payments could gain direct access to digital assets. This move would demystify crypto, embedding it into the user experience of devices and apps that are already indispensable. The psychological and practical barrier to entry would evaporate, potentially unleashing the next great wave of users into the ecosystem.
The Immovable Titans: Why Ethereum and Solana Will Hold the Line
Amidst this corporate fervor, Qureshi draws a critical and counterintuitive distinction. While bullish on private enterprise adoption, he is profoundly skeptical of a new breed of public Layer 1 (L1) blockchains launched by well-known fintech brands. Chains like Tempo, Arc, and the recently announced Robinhood Chain are entering a brutally competitive arena.
He argues that these "fintech chains will ultimately underwhelm. Their metrics—daily active addresses, meaningful stablecoin flows, total value locked—will fail to reach critical mass. The reason is fundamental: building a vibrant, decentralized ecosystem is not a marketing challenge solvable by a trusted brand name; it is a cultural and technological endeavor. Developers, the lifeblood of any chain, gravitate towards neutral, credibly decentralized, and richly endowed platforms. They seek the strongest security guarantees, the largest user base, and the most robust tooling.
"Despite the excitement around the recent crop of fintech chains, their metrics will underwhelm," Qureshi states. "The best developers will continue to build on neutral infrastructure chains. In this view, established giants Ethereum and Solana are not relics; they are the enduring foundations. Ethereum, with its vast DeFi ecosystem and rolling out of scaling via zero-knowledge (ZK) technology, and Solana, with its blistering speed and consumer-focused momentum, are predicted to not just hold their ground but to overdeliver on expectations while the newcomers struggle. Their network effects, security, and cultural cachet form a moat that is far deeper than many anticipate.
A Reshaped Market: Bitcoin, Stablecoins, and the AI Mirage
Looking at the broader digital asset landscape, Qureshi’s 2026 forecast paints a picture of growth, rotation, and tempered expectations.
He sees Bitcoin, the flagship asset, powering to new heights above $150,000, fueled by its hardening narrative as digital gold and institutional safe haven. However, in a sign of a maturing market, Bitcoin’s overall market dominance—its share of the total crypto market cap—is expected to fall. This indicates a risk-on rotation where capital flows into high-utility smart contract platforms and emerging application tokens, reflecting a market looking beyond store-of-value narratives.
The stablecoin sector, currently valued at over $312 billion, is poised for another massive growth spurt of approximately 60%. This expansion will be fueled by their accelerating use as the primary settlement rail for global commerce and finance within the crypto economy. However, this growth will come with increased competition. Qureshi anticipates Tether’s (USDT) dominant market share will gently recede from 60% to 55% as alternatives like USDC and new entrants capture more of the expanding pie.
Beyond finance, the predictions turn notably cautious on two of tech’s hottest trends. Qureshi is bullish on the organic, explosive growth of prediction markets—platforms like Polymarket that harness crowd wisdom to forecast real-world events—seeing them as a genuinely novel and powerful use case for decentralized networks.
Conversely, he delivers a sobering assessment of the much-hyped fusion of AI and crypto. For 2026, he predicts AI will find no significant, native economic use case within crypto beyond marginal improvements in security and analytics. The futuristic vision of AI agents transacting and paying each other on-chain is relegated to a distant horizon, not the immediate future. Similarly, he offers no hope for a cure to the internet’s plague: the relentless proliferation of social media spambots will continue unabated, with no cryptographic silver bullet emerging in the next two years.
The Bottom Line: Integration, Not Invasion
The overarching theme of 2026, as forecast by Qureshi, is strategic integration. It will not be a year where corporations take over crypto. Instead, it will be the year they learn to harness its infrastructure for their specific needs, while simultaneously opening the gates for their billions of users via integrated wallets.
The public blockchain space, meanwhile, will undergo a stress test of utility versus branding. The failure of fintech L1s to gain traction will serve as a powerful testament that in the world of decentralized networks, organic community, technological rigor, and credible neutrality are assets that cannot be bought or branded into existence. They must be earned, block by block.
The result will be a more complex, layered, and mature ecosystem: a bustling base layer of neutral public protocols like Ethereum and Solana, upon which a new stratum of private, corporate-specific chains will be built and bridged, all while the world interacts with it all through the simple, familiar interface of a tech giant’s wallet. The walls are not crumbling; they are becoming porous, and the flow of value and innovation is about to change direction forever.
Whether you’re a beginner or a seasoned investor, BYDFi gives you the tools to trade with confidence — low fees, fast execution, copy trading for newcomers, and access to hundreds of digital assets in a secure, user-friendly environment
2026-01-16 · 8 days ago0 061
BYDFi Official Blog
Popular Tags
Popular Questions
How to Use Bappam TV to Watch Telugu, Tamil, and Hindi Movies?
How to Withdraw Money from Binance to a Bank Account in the UAE?
ISO 20022 Coins: What They Are, Which Cryptos Qualify, and Why It Matters for Global Finance
Bitcoin Dominance Chart: Your Guide to Crypto Market Trends in 2025
The Best DeFi Yield Farming Aggregators: A Trader's Guide